Hongkong Exchange – a haven for miner company

Hong Kong’s stock exchange is making a slow but steady push to become a listing venue for global mining companies, even though it is a sector with a rich seam of broken dreams. In the past, mining companies — especially those in the development stage — were restricted to specialist listing venues such as Toronto or Perth, where the exchanges themselves had sophisticated means of assessing the value of the projects being listed.

But as the commodity boom rumbles inexorably on and miners became majors, they have shifted to larger, global exchanges such as London. The recently announced merger between Glencore and Xstrata is the latest move in the maturation of a sector that was once considered extremely high risk.

HKEx is acutely aware of these trends, but its ambitions to become a global venue for mining stocks are clear. It also realises that these stocks can be extremely volatile — and with the Hong Kong government sensitive to retail investors losing money, it has taken a cautious approach to allowing such companies to list.

One such example was IRC, which was spun out of UK-listed but Russian-focused mining company Petropavlosk in September 2010. The stock is up some 40% so far this year, although it is still some 20% off its IPO price.

“The HKEx is extremely good in how it looks after retail investors,” said Peter Hambro, chairman of Petropavlosk, speaking on the sidelines of the Troika Dialog Russia Forum in Moscow last week. “When it took on the listing of mining companies it took a long time.”

Petropavlosk still owns 65.5% of IRC, which is run by Hambro’s son, Jay. Mining companies may be unfamiliar in Asia, but such governance structures are not.

The current trend in listing venues is that they should reflect not only where companies can get the highest valuation, but also where their customers are. Also speaking at the Forum was Ivan Glasenberg, the CEO of Glencore, on the day that the merger with Xstrata was announced. He said that it made sense for the company to have a secondary listing in Hong Kong as China was consuming 50% of the world’s commodities. But on a per capita basis, the Chinese only consume 16% of the world average when it comes to aluminium and 25% of the average consumption of oil. China is already the biggest player in the global commodities market — and it is getting bigger.

Being close to customers clearly makes sense from an operational point of view, but increasingly companies are looking for both customers and shareholders to be close.

“Most of the companies listed in Toronto are operating in that timezone,” said Hambro. “But as we are seeing the Chinese population becoming more financially educated, that means demand for this type of investment [mining stocks] will grow.”

Other global miners such as Vale from Brazil, Kazakhmys from Kazakhstan and South Gobi Resources from Mongolia, have already joined Glencore in taking a secondary listing on HKEx. They join Chinese miners such as Zijin Mining, Zhaojin Mining and Yanzhou Coal, which have primary Hong Kong listings.

Such listings give mining companies the acquisition currency for deals up and down the supply chain. And if Asian investors will buy this stock, the mining companies are only too willing to sell it. “All commodity traders — if they want to buy assets — need to list in order to get permanent capital,” said Glasenberg. “Otherwise they run out of cash when their partners leave. Being public gives you a lot of flexibility and firepower, and I like it.”

Speaking about Petropavlosk’s gold mine in the Amur region of the Russian Far East, on the border with China, Hambro said: “We are financing the mine from China and we are building it with Chinese labour. We have a symbiotic relationship with China.”

It remains to be seen if Chinese investors are willing to have a similarly symbiotic relationship with the miners.

Chinese Lunar New Year sale dropped!

Chinese shoppers on their Lunar New Year holiday were less lavish than expected by Hong Kong jewelers, curbed spending on beauty brands and slowed spending at South Korean stores. They may keep that pace in the coming year of the dragon.

Holiday sales on the mainland grew 16 percent to 470 billion yuan ($75 billion), according to data from the Ministry of Commerce, the slowest pace since the 2009 financial crisis and three percentage points below last year’s increase. China is finding it is not immune to global economic forces and the slowdown is hitting Chinese consumers, who may increase this year’s spending at a slower pace than in 2011.

This may mean trouble for the growing number of foreign companies rushing into China, especially luxury brands, said Jason Yuan, an analyst at UOB Kay Hian in Shanghai.

“This year is going to be tough, probably the toughest year for many foreign luxury brands since they entered into China,” he said.

“Sales of jewelry and valuable watches during Chinese New Year were quite disappointing,” said Caroline Mak, chairman of the Hong Kong Retail Management Association. “Sales growth of over 30 percent last year is unsustainable against a worsening macro-economic backdrop.”

Some member jewelers reported customers buying smaller diamonds than they used to, she said.
Smaller Diamonds

Hong Kong jeweler Chow Sang Sang Holdings International Ltd. (116), whose sales grew as much as 28 percent in the first three days of the holiday, expects quarterly sales growth to slow to 10 percent in the second quarter from 15 percent in the first.

Sales director Dennis Lau declined to make projections for the rest of the year because of worries a further global downturn could hurt consumer sentiment.

“We can’t see how strong the recovery in the U.S. is, and the debt crisis in Europe never seems to end,” Lau said. “If those economies mess things again, it could severely hurt global consumer confidence.”

Twinky Choi, an assistant at a Hong Kong Shiseido Co Ltd. (4911) cosmetics store, is seeing that first-hand.

“People are browsing,” Choi said. “They don’t buy instantly, unlike last year when customers were grabbing everything.”

China’s economic growth, hurt by a property market slump and slower export growth, is poised to weaken to 8.5 percent this year from about 9.2 percent in 2011, according to the median estimate of economists in a Bloomberg survey.
‘Momentum Not Exciting’

“The momentum is not exciting,” noted Macquarie Capital Securities analyst Linda Huang.

The Lunar holiday, like Thanksgiving or Christmas in the U.S., is among the biggest selling periods in China and parts of Asia. Chinese consumers spend more at home and at overseas vacation spots such as Hong Kong and Macau. This year’s holiday extended from Jan. 23 to Jan. 29 and marked the start of the year of the dragon.

“It does give some indications on retail sentiment,” said Phoebe Tse, an analyst at Barclays Capital Asia Ltd. “It is one of the busiest shopping seasons.”

Lipstick and fragrance seller Sa Sa International Holdings Ltd. (178) said Lunar sales were below its forecasts. The retailer’s Hong Kong and Macau sales rose 17 percent during the Lunar holiday from Jan. 23 to Jan. 29, which was “slightly below our expectations,” said Chief Executive Officer Simon Kwok in a statement. “Looking ahead, the group remains cautiously optimistic.”

Mak said her association expects Hong Kong retail sales growth to slow to 15 percent this year from 25 percent in 2011.
China Home Prices

China’s consumers have been hurt by a drop in home prices, which fell for a fifth month in January, according to SouFun Holdings Ltd., the nation’s biggest real-estate website owner. Residential prices slid in 60 of 100 cities tracked by the company in January, according to SouFun. The benchmark Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite Index has also fallen 17 percent over the past year, lowering the value of consumers’ investments.

“Macro-economic uncertainties impact consumer confidence,” Tse said. “They feel more secure when they have money in the pocket.”

Chinese tourists on holiday drove up January casino revenue in the gambling center of Macau 35 percent to 25 billion patacas ($3 billion). Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS)’s Sands China Ltd. (1928), Wynn Resorts Ltd. (WYNN)’s Wynn Macau Ltd. (1128) and MGM Resorts International (MGM)’s MGM China Holdings Ltd. (2282) compete in Macau, the world’s largest gambling hub.
Slower Casino Growth

Even so, high-stakes gamblers, who bring in the most revenue and can bet as much as $250,000 a hand, may not have boosted sales as much as previous years because of less available credit, BOC International analyst Edwin Fan said.

Banks have less money to lend because China’s policy makers have raised interest rates and reserve ratio requirements.

Macau casino revenue growth may slow to 22 percent this year from 42 percent a year ago, said Victor Yip, an analyst at UOB Kay Hian Ltd.

At South Korean retailer Shinsegae Co. (004170) sales rose 9 percent between Jan. 6 and Jan. 17, a promotional period just before the new year for tourists. That was slower than last year’s 16 percent, said spokeswoman Lee Jung Ah.

At Korea’s Lotte Shopping Co. (023530) sales growth in a promotional period from Jan. 6 to Jan. 19 was 9.8 percent this year compared with last year’s holiday increase of 16 percent.

Expenditure per customer at Tokyo’s VenusFort mall didn’t rise and wasn’t proportional to the rise in Chinese visitors, probably because of the stronger Japanese yen, said spokesman Yusuke Nishimura. The yen, which has risen because of demand for safer assets amid Europe’s debt crisis, has gained 7.1 percent against the dollar in a year and 2.5 percent against the yuan.
Jewelry Sales

Hong Kong jeweler Luk Fook Holdings International Ltd. (590) said sales at stores open at least a year grew 13 percent in mainland China and 4 percent in Hong Kong and Macau during the week-long holiday. That was below expectations as “a seasonal surge failed to materialize” for the industry, according to Citigroup Global Markets.

“The sales of jewelry and valuable watches are good indicators of how strong the Chinese tourists’ purchasing power is,” Mak from the Hong Kong Retail Management Association said. “We expect some Chinese shoppers to cut back on big-ticket items as the wealth effect fades.”

Sa Sa International shares dropped 5.7 percent to HK$4.84, the biggest drop since Nov. 10, at the close of Hong Kong trading. Luk Fook closed 2.2 percent lower at HK$26.50.

RQFII Program

China’s securities regulator is planning to expand the RMB qualified foreign institutional investor (RQFII) programme to accelerate the opening up of domestic capital markets to overseas investors, its vice-chairman Yao Gang told the Asian Financial Forum yesterday.

The RQFII scheme was introduced last month to permit Hong Kong subsidiaries of Chinese fund companies and securities firms to raise renminbi offshore and invest back into the onshore securities market.

An initial quota of Rmb20 billion ($3.1 billion) was announced to be shared among firms approved for a licence, and already this sum has been allocated in full to 21 companies.

And at the forum Yao Gang affirmed that the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is intent on expanding the programme.

Ben Zhang, joint managing director of Hai Tong International Asset Management, predicted the CSRC would unveil a second batch of RQFII quotas within six to nine months, with an amount exceeding the previous Rmb20 billion.

Having launched an offshore RMB fixed income fund only yesterday, Doris Lian, CEO of Da Cheng International AM, points out that expansion of the RQFII scheme will stimulate further growth in offshore RMB deposits, generating a need for more RQFII investment products.

CSRC’s efforts to push forward the RQFII programme are in line with Beijing’s drive to increase overseas investment this year and improve the structure of the domestic capital markets, including greater participation from institutional investors.

During a securities and futures regulatory meeting on January 9, CSRC chairman Guo Shuqing indicated plans to quicken the approvals process for qualified foreign institutional investor (QFII) licences and increase investment quotas, and at the same time enlarge the RQFII scheme.

And last weekend Dai Xianglong, chairman of the National Council for Social Security Fund (NCSSF), urged incremental expansion of QFII investment quotas and the eventual removal of quota restrictions.

He suggested that China learn from the experiences of other countries such as India in terms of opening up their domestic stock market to foreign investors and gradually increasing QFII investment quotas until the restrictions are finally abolished.

Close regulatory restrictions on foreign institutional capital could be replaced by the establishment of caps on each institutional investor’s holding of individual stocks, and that could be executed automatically in the trading process, Dai notes.

According to CSRC’s latest disclosure on December 13 last year, a total of 121 foreign institutions have obtained QFII licences. Korea’s National Pension System is among the latest batch to receive a licence

2012 Prediction for Year of Dragon

The arrival of the year of the dragon next week could bring about a change of fortunes for the Hong Kong stock market, although not for a while yet. At least if one is it to believe CLSA’s popular Feng Shui Index — a tongue-in-cheek look at what lies ahead when interpreted in the context of the Chinese zodiac and the five elements of metal, water, wood, fire and earth.

While designed to put a light-hearted spin on the bank’s predictions for the year — it does arguably make CLSA stand out among the numerous outlooks that are published this time of year — some people seem to take it quite seriously. According to Philip Chow, a transport analyst at the firm who preceded over the release of the 18th incarnation of the index yesterday dressed in a traditional Chinese silk jacket, when the stock markets collapsed in September last year he was getting emails from people asking whether things would improve in the year of the dragon.

And it seems this could well be the case. A mythological creature, the dragon is viewed as a major game-changer and in Chinese history it usually appears as a pre-curser of an event of great relevance, Chow told a packed room at the China Club in Hong Kong yesterday.

“The dragon represents a transition of power, a change between old and new and is always seen as an inflection point,” he said.

Thinking back to the previous year of the dragon in 2000, which coincided with the collapse of the internet bubble, inflection point and game changer sound about right. Luckily for investors, one has to view the zodiac sign in the context of the five elements as well, and that makes 2012 the year of the water dragon. The way to interpret this, according to CLSA and the feng shui masters it has consulted to compile its index, is that the dragon will emerge from the water in a move that will herald positive events ahead.

“The dragon is bold and when it surges, it surges big,” Chow said, although he did acknowledge that the dragon is also an unpredictable beast that spits fire when it is angry. So, investors need to watch out they don’t get burnt, he said.

The last time the water dragon emerged from the lake was in 1952 and while the Dow Jones index finished higher that year, the gains did not come without a struggle. When the dragon handed over to the snake early the following year, the index had risen only about 8%.

CLSA’s feng shui index suggests that it will take the dragon until August to accumulate enough energy to come out of the water. But after this inflection point has been hit, the dragon will “turn sharply and head north at a rapid pace.”

“If our readings are right, September should be one of the best months of the year, with plenty of activity in the markets,” CLSA said and added that the upward trend should continue through October and November. However, since apparently you can never see the head and the tail of the dragon at the same time, the rally should run out of steam come December, although the index suggests that the market will continue to shuffle sideways through to the end of January 2013.

This year is also more balanced in terms of the five energy elements, which suggests that the market will be less volatile in 2012 than it was last year. Fire is the only element that is not represented at all this year, but since fire subdues metal — think gold — this should be positive for the financial markets. That said, metal and earth are also lacking in the first half, which is why the positive breakout isn’t expected to come until the second half — indeed, as the dragon sinks back into the lagoon after chasing the rabbit back into its whole next week, the market may well continue to slide until July. In March, the best direction for money is west, which doesn’t bode well for Hong Kong. Although Chow noted on a direct question that this could perhaps also refer to western China as this region continues to develop.

According to Emily Lam, who normally works in institutional sales but yesterday doubled as Chow’s apprentice in outlining the feng shui predictions, the prevalence of water and earth will make this a good year for stocks related to these two elements, including cement, gaming, property, tourism and transport. Cement in particular is expected to fair “exceptionally well”, she said.

Given the dragon’s association with a transition of power, it is perhaps logical that this is the year for a leadership change in China. There are also a number of elections to be held this year, including the US presidential race. However, Chow refrained from making a call on whether the presence of the dragon means President Obama will fail to be reelected.

Curiously though, there is little in the charts to suggest a major change of fortune for Xi Jinping, a water snake who is widely expected to take over from Hu Jintao as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party later this year — although there is a rather understated hint of a job opening in the autumn, the CLSA report noted.

“This isn’t slated to be his best year by a long shot,” it continued, playing on the Cantonese word for dragon, which is long. “Best not to cross him, though, if he is true to type: snakes always settle scores.”

In Germany, Angela Merkel, like all wood horses, is faced with the threat of “a shocker of a year” and the fact that her inner animal is the sheep doesn’t bode well in times of trouble. That said, the wood horse is one of the strongest and most determined signs with seemingly endless stores of patience, persistence and persuasion — even this sceptical reporter must admit that is spot on with regard to the German chancellor so perhaps there is something to this Zodiac thing after all. And encouragingly, wood horses are “known for making decisions that turn out to be spot on”. Let’s hope for the sake of the future of the euro-zone that this continues to be the case.

One person, who is expected to have a “fab” year during the year of the dragon is Queen Elizabeth II. A fire tiger, she will celebrate 60 years as head of state this year, which means she has been on the throne for one full 60-year cycle of the Chinese zodiac. Based on the feng shui principles, she has begun one of the luckiest periods of her life and the fact that water, which is so prevalent this year, is her lucky element is “simply icing on the cake”, CLSA said, referring to it as a “win-Windsor” situation.

The year of the dragon will replace the year of the rabbit on January 23

China’s Elite Worries…

The biggest threat to China’s economy in 2012 is a lack of timely and thorough reform of the financial market and political system, Chinese government officials and business leaders concluded at the Asia Financial Forum in Hong Kong yesterday. This year is likely to be challenging for the world’s fastest-growing economy. As uncertainties in global markets and weakening demand from Europe and the US erode exports, so China needs dynamic systems to ensure its resilience during the economic downturn. However, the government tends to respond to crises with short-term stimulus policies rather than “deep reform”, the panellists agreed, arguing that more fundamental changes are needed. There is no shortage of theories about what may cause China’s economy to suffer a hard landing. Foreign observers typically identify risks such as rising property prices, stubborn inflation and weakening exports, but China’s elite seemingly have very different concerns. Tu Guangshao “China needs deeper reform in its financial sector,” Tu Guangshao, vice-mayor of Shanghai, said at the panel. “It should reduce government interference in the financial market and liberalise the renminbi interest rate and exchange rate market.” Tu, who is the former vice-chairman of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, said the lack of reform is the biggest obstacle in Shanghai’s development as an international financial centre, however, he is confident that the city will achieve that goal in 2020. John Zhao, senior vice-president of Lenovo Holdings, also argued that a lack of financial reform has stood in the way of many opportunities, and complained that China had failed to mobilise its capital reserves. “China is changing its role from the world’s factory to the world’s market,” he said. “We often see cash-loaded Chinese corporate and individual buyers shopping around the globe, but there are not enough investment channels at home.” Zhao said that China has many very promising private businesses that could provide good investment opportunities, but in times of difficulty, government policies always favour state-owned companies ahead of private businesses that could probably use the financial aid more efficiently. An underdeveloped financial market at home and restrictions on investing overseas, along with a negative interest rate and volatile stock market, have left Chinese people with few investment options besides the property market — but housing prices have been falling for several months and will fall a further 15% to 20% in big cities this year, according to Deutsche Bank forecasts. Tomson Li, chairman and CEO of TCL Corporation, who also took part in the panel, agreed that China should encourage investment in the private business sector. He also said that China still enjoys much advantage as the world’s factory because it has the best infrastructure in any emerging market. The head of China’s giant home-appliance exporter said the country’s export growth will slow down in 2012, but will still stand above 10% as made-in-China goods are still competitive. He estimates last year’s export growth was around 13%. The panel agreed that rising social tensions are also a threat to the economy, but it doesn’t appear to be an imminent one.

China in Canada

For nearly four years, from 2006 to 2009, China made no major investment in Canada,  even though in this period China’s energy demand grew rapidly and Chinese energy firms invested heavily around the world. Yet, in the past two years, China has poured well over $16-billion of cash into Canada — and that is counting only the eight largest energy deals alone. What has changed?

Based on my research and the annual Canada-China Energy & Environment Forum I have organized since 2004, eight specific factors explain China’s renewed interests in investing in the Canadian energy sector.

First, the Harper Conservative government changed its hardline policies toward China from early 2009 onward, and repeatedly assured Beijing that Canada welcomes Chinese investment. Such a policy shift is significant since China does not like to do business with politically unfriendly countries, be they democracies or dictatorships. There is a clear, well-documented correlation between Canada’s overall relations with China and the levels of Chinese investment in Canada: Chinese firms did not invest in the Canadian energy sector after the newly elected Conservatives removed China from its foreign-policy priority list. But since late 2009, Chinese money has flowed into Canada with the resumption of Canada-China summit diplomacy and an improved overall political relationship.

Second, the North American stock market has been low since the 2008 economic crisis, presenting buying opportunities for cash-rich Chinese firms and selling pressures for cash-strapped Canadian companies. Take Sinopec’s $2.2-billion purchase of Daylight Energy, the first 100% takeover of a North American energy firm by a Chinese oil company. The offer was $10.08 per share, more than double Daylight’s closing price of $4.59 prior to the announcement. While Daylight shareholders are happy with the generous offer, Sinopec looks for future growth beyond the total it put down. Another case is the nearly bankrupt Opti Canada Ltd., which was bought out by the third-largest Chinese energy company, China National Offshore Oil Corp. Opti was financially bailed out while CNOOC entered a joint-venture arrangement with Nexen Energy to keep the Long Lake project going.

Third, global oil prices remain high, making long-term extraction of oil sands and other Canadian energy resources sustainable and profitable. When Chinese oil majors began to come into Canada’s oil sands in the mid-2000, they were unsure whether the high oil prices represented short-term volatility or if they were there to stay. Plus with Canada’s complex and long regulatory process, high labour cost and lack of access to shipping large volumes of oil to the West Coast, they hesitated and waited. Now, there is enough confidence for oil sands development and the Chinese energy giants have taken their plunge into Canada. Sinopec’s 50/50 joint venture with Total in the Northern Light project is not expected to get to production until early 2020s, but it is moving forward.

Fourth, the ongoing turmoil in North Africa and the Middle East over the past year has taught Chinese investors a painful lesson: Putting your fortune into resource-rich but unstable states or into fast deals with dictators entails higher costs and greater risks. After Libya descended into civil war, the Chinese government had to mount an unprecedented mission to evacuate more than 35,000 of its nationals working in the country, and later, the Ministry of Commerce revealed that in Libya alone, China lost $18-billion in investments and ongoing projects. In a recent conference in Beijing, Zhang Guobao, who just retired as the head of China’s National Energy Administration and still serves as the chairman of the National Energy Security Advisory Committee to Premier Wen Jiabao, made it clear in his speech that countries such as Canada and Australia, both resource-rich and democratic, should top the Chinese FDI list.

Fifth, Canadian energy companies have become more competitive in their engagement with Chinese counterparts. It is true that Canada is richly endowed with energy and other resources while China needs energy and has a $3.2-trillion foreign reserve. And yet these are necessary, but insufficient, conditions for closer Canada-China energy cooperation. Canadian firms have learned that they need to be more assertive in competing with companies from other countries for Chinese investment. Up to three years ago, major Canadian oil producers were largely absent from the Canada-China Energy & Environment Forum. Now they are a major presence at this annual event. Media reports on Chinese investments in Canada have overlooked the fact that Canadians are now more proactive in courting the Chinese energy firms. Although facing many challenges in dealing with an emerging superpower with a different culture, Canadian energy company CEOs, many of whom have never been to Asia before, now fly to Beijing and other Asian capitals to pursue investments, joint ventures and other opportunities.

Sixth, the Chinese energy firms have emerged from the toddler stage to become bolder in conducting merger and acquisition and joint venture activities around the world. All the Canadian subsidiaries of the big three Chinese national oil companies are staffed primarily with technical people in charge of existing local operations. With more experience and better market information, Chinese energy M&A and JV teams are coming to Calgary more frequently. Not only have Chinese firms moved from minority holding positions to full ownership and operator status, as demonstrated by Daylight and MacKay River, they are also diversifying into conventional oil, gas and shale sectors from the large-scale oil sands focus.

Seventh, the growing Chinese interests in Canada’s energy sectors go beyond equity investment and production for profits. All the Chinese NOCs are aiming to become large integrated international companies that can compete with other well-established international oil companies. The management skills and technical know-how of extracting heavy oil and shale that the Canadian firms possess are exactly what the Chinese companies lack. With well over $24-billion invested in Venezuela’s heavy oil exploration and having a domestic shale reserve that is larger than both the U.S. and Canada combined, Chinese energy companies will benefit tremendously from their investment in the Canadian energy sector. Joint ventures with Canadian firms have also given Chinese access to the U.S. energy market, as demonstrated by the recent JV agreements between Nexen Inc. and CNOOC to develop two Gulf of Mexico plays, and the $2.5-billion deal between Devon Energy and Sinopec that gives the latter 30% ownership in five of Devon’s U.S. shale operations.

Finally, Canada’s recent Asian market diversification drive after the U.S. State Department delayed the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline has given Chinese energy companies further incentive to invest in Canada. Although keeping a low profile in the intensifying Canadian debate on building more pipelines to the West Coast, China and other Asian countries hope to have access to Canadian oil and gas in the near future. Sinopec has invested in Enbridge’s $100-million Gateway pipeline regulatory approval fund, as has MED Energy, in which CNOOC has had a stake since 2005.

If most of these conditions remain, and there is little indication that they will change in the short term, we can certainly expect more Chinese investment in Canada’s energy sector. The Chinese have obviously concluded that their investment in Canada is good for China. But are Chinese investments good for Canada? The debate on this question in Canada seems to have just begun.

M & A in Asia

Bankers were busy during the end of December putting together mergers and acquisitions that are likely to set the tone for 2012 — there are deals to be made, particularly if it helps solidify industry position.

“There was a significant number of high-quality M&A transactions announced in mid-to-late December 2011 so this augurs well for 2012. I remain bullish for the coming year,” said Colin Banfield, head of M&A for Asia-Pacific at Citi.

“I worry about the eurozone and, although it presents opportunities for Asian investors to acquire assets at relatively attractive valuation levels (and in some cases to even make once-in-a generation type acquisitions), the overhanging structural and macroeconomic issues will weigh heavily on decision-making. In contrast, I am more confident about prospects closer to home, where I expect a strong level of intra-Asian M&A and greater cross-border deal activity between the various emerging market regions.”

And that’s what we saw at the end of the year. On December 19, Li & Fung (Retailing), a member of the privately held Li & Fung Group, and Hang Ten jointly announced a voluntary general offer by Li & Fung for all of Hang Ten’s issued shares. At the offer price of HK$2.70 per share, the total purchase consideration for 100% of Hang Ten will be about $340 million.

This is Li & Fung’s first significant non-connected public takeover in Hong Kong. And it’s a sensible pair-up. Li & Fung is well established as a retailer in the region — it operates more than 400 Circle K convenience stores in Hong Kong and China. Hang Ten is a popular sportswear brand for consumers looking for clean-cut clothing at a reasonable price without going to a market to haggle. Both are marketers of basics that tend to be recession-proof.

Citi is acting as the exclusive financial adviser to Li & Fung Group and is providing a committed loan on a sole basis to help finance the acquisition. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter and is subject to shareholder approval as well as a tender offer acceptance level at 69.06%.

A few days later, on December 22, Yanzhou Coal Mining and its wholly owned subsidiary, Yancoal Australia, agreed to buy Gloucester Coal for about A$700 million ($709 million) and a 23% stake in its Australian unit, creating one of the biggest listed Australian coal producers.

Under the plan, Sydney-based Gloucester, which is controlled by Noble Group, will merge with Yancoal Australia. Yanzhou will own 77% of the new company and the chairman and CEO roles will both be nominees of Yanzhou. This adds four coal projects and access to ports in Australia, where Yanzhou operates six mines.

Gloucester shareholders will own the remaining 23% and will also receive a A$700 million cash payment by way of a special dividend and an equal capital reduction, which is equivalent to about A$3.20 per share. Noble Group, the controlling shareholder of Gloucester that currently holds 64.5%, will hold about 14% on closing.

Yanzhou also offered a payment of as much as A$3 a share should the stock fall below A$6.96 in the 18 months after the deal closes. This value protection clause and the dividend payment imply a value of A$2.2 billion for Gloucester.

Yancoal Australia will replace Gloucester on the country’s stock exchange, allowing Yanzhou to use the purchase as a means of listing its Australian assets. And indeed this deal creates Australia’s biggest listed pure-play coal company and the ninth-biggest globally (based on reserves).

The proposed merger is subject to a number of conditions, though Yanzhou’s board has already approved the transaction. Yanzhou is advised by Citi, UBS and Goldman Sachs, as well as by law firms Freehills, Baker & McKenzie and King & Wood. Gloucester is advised by Lazard and Noble by Blackstone.

The very next day, on December 23, Khazanah Nasional, Malaysia’s state investment company, offered more than $900 million for a majority of Turkey’s biggest hospital chain, Acibadem Saglik Hizmetleri & Ticaret.

Integrated Healthcare Holdings, which is controlled by Khazanah, will buy 60% of Acibadem from private equity firm Abraaj Capital, and Khazanah will buy another 15% through a combination of a cash payment and the exchange of newly issued IHH shares.

Upon completion of the transaction, Abraaj will become a shareholder in IHH, which is one of the biggest emerging market healthcare service providers, operating more than 3,000 beds across 76 healthcare facilities in Asia. The combined group will be among the largest hospital groups operating globally and across emerging markets.

The investment in IHH follows Abraaj’s expansion into Southeast Asia through the opening of its Singapore operations earlier this year. Meanwhile, Khazanah has spent $3.7 billion on acquisitions of healthcare services providers since 2005, according to Bloomberg data. In July 2010, Khazanah offered S$3.5 billion ($2.7 billion) for the 76.1% of Singapore’s Parkway Holdings.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Goldman Sachs are acting as joint financial advisers to Abraaj Capital.

Global M&A volume reached $2.81 trillion in 2011, a 3% increase from the 2010 volume of $2.74 trillion, according to Dealogic. However, the fourth quarter volume of $640 billion was the lowest quarterly volume since the second quarter of 2010 ($593 billion). In Asia, M&A transactions stood at $543.1 billion, down slightly from 2010 when M&A deals totaled $543.8 billion

Battle for China’s top 9 Leadership Post

There is no better vantage point for understanding Chinese leadership politics than to analyze the nine individuals who make up the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC). Despite the highly diverse and divergent assessments of elite politics which populate the overseas China-watching communities, the last decade has witnessed a surprisingly strong consensus emerge on the pivotal importance of the PSC. The top Chinese leader, General Secretary of the Party and President Hu Jintao, is now understood to be no more than the “first among equals” in this supreme decisionmaking body. Within the People’s Republic of China (PRC), a new Chinese term, jiuchangwei, was recently created to refer exclusively to these nine political heavyweights. In line with this development, the Chinese authorities have placed increasing emphasis on “collective leadership,” which the 2007 Party Congress Communiqué defines as “a system with division of responsibilities among individual leaders in an effort to prevent arbitrary decision-making by a single top leader.”

The composition of the new PSC—especially the generational attributes and individual idiosyncratic characteristics, group dynamics, and the factional balance of power on the committee—will have profound implications for China’s economic priorities, social stability, political trajectory, and foreign relations. Who are the leading candidates? Through what process will they be chosen? How do their political and professional backgrounds resemble or differ from each other? Into which factional alliances or political coalitions are they divided? What political strategies might they adopt to secure one of the nine spots on the PSC in the months leading up to the 18th Party Congress? What economic agenda, sociopolitical initiatives, and foreign policies will each member of this powerful group be likely to promote? Thoughtfully addressing these questions is essential for the United States and other countries, particularly at a time when China has more influence on the world economy and regional security than perhaps ever before.

China – New outlook for 2012 => Business Perspective

Business confidence fell in the fourth quarter, the second consecutive drop, amid growing concern over a slowdown in the world’s second-largest economy.

The business confidence index was down 6 percentage points more than the third quarter to 41.7 per cent, the People’s Bank of China, the central bank, said in a statement on Thursday.

A reading above 50 expresses optimism; anything beneath that figure indicates pessimism.

Of 5,000 companies surveyed, 24.8 per cent believe that the economy’s temperature is “relatively cool”, while a decreasing number believe that things are still going well. The amount holding the latter viewpoint has dropped from 74.3 per cent in the first quarter to 67.1 per cent now, according to the central bank.

Fang Qi, general manager of Ningbo Shentong Electrical Co Ltd, said the company’s profit margin will probably drop by more than 10 per cent this year due to falling sales, rising labor costs and dollar depreciation.

“We are now developing new products to attract customers in emerging markets as demand from Europe and the US continues to fall,” Fang said. “But the rising cost of labor and raw materials remains a big challenge for us next year.”

As a medium-sized vacuum cleaner manufacturer, Shentong’s labor costs have risen nearly 20 per cent this year, Fang said.

Her woes are shared by Zhang Beilei, the owner of Wenzhou Gaotian Shoe Co Ltd.

“We’re not very positive about the current shoe industry. It has been shrinking a lot due to lower demand from abroad and higher costs at home,” Zhang said.

Zhang said that slimmer profit margins for small and medium firms will definitely worsen and more companies and factories will be forced to shut down in the coming year.

Wang Haifeng, director of the International Cooperation Center affiliated with the National Development and Reform Commission, said the global economic slowdown, China’s reluctance to launch a large stimulus plan and a falling property market are major reasons for declining business confidence.

A number of manufacturers in Zhejiang, Fujian and Jiangsu provinces also have property investments and feel the market correction, Wang said.

“Their manufacturing business, in fact, is basically fine. But they need money to save their investments in the property sector,” Wang said.

Hou Yunchun, deputy director of the Development Research Center of the State Council, said that the property market will pose the biggest challenge for China’s economy in the coming years.

The property bubble should be deflated slowly and not pricked, Hou said.

China’s economic growth slowed to 9.1 per cent in the third quarter from 9.7 per cent in the first and 9.5 per cent in the second.

Most economists estimated China’s economy will grow at a range between 8.2 per cent and 8.6 per cent in 2012.

But investment bank Nomura International (Hong Kong) Ltd said the growth is likely to slip to 7.9 per cent next year. The last time that China’s economic growth was below 8 per cent was in 1998 when the financial crisis hit Asia.

The China Index Academy, a real estate consultancy institute, said in a recent report that property prices in the major cities would fall 20 per cent next year because the policy restriction on the number of homes a family can purchase will continue.

The price drop in smaller cities, according to the report, will be close to 15 per cent. And the fall in even smaller cities will be around 3 per cent to 5 per cent.

Meanwhile, property was replaced by funds and wealth management products as primary investment choices for residents, according to the central bank survey.

Only 13.9 per cent of residents plan to purchase a home in the coming three months, down 0.3 percentage point from the third quarter, the survey showed. The proportion is close to a record low of 13.2 per cent in the third quarter of 2008.

Expectations for inflation in China were lower for the first quarter of 2012 versus the fourth quarter of this year, according to the central bank’s survey of 20,000 households.

Among households surveyed, 36.8 per cent of respondents expected consumer prices to climb in the coming quarter, sharply lower than 49.6 per cent a quarter ago.

After a slew of tightening measures by the government this year, including six hikes in the bank reserve requirement ratio and three interest rate rises, the consumer price index, the main gauge of inflation, eased to 4.2 per cent in November from the three-year high of 6.5 per cent in July.

The central bank reiterated that it will continue to implement a prudent monetary policy in 2012 while making it more “targeted, flexible and foresighted” to support stable and healthy economic growth.

China 2012- Leadership Transition

Well, this is what the Chinese called the generational transfer of power. Like elsewhere, generational change of power does not occur that often. In China, it’s only occured three times in the PRC history. The first time – two times, actually – ended up, sadly and tragically, with the cultural revolution for the first, and 1989 Tiananmen [Square] for the second. The third generational transfer of power took place nine years ago in 2002 at the 16th Party Congress, which was remarkably peaceful, institutionalized, and orderly.

Now, this upcoming one will occur in a very interesting time. At least three things make this one particularly important.

The first one is what you just mentioned, that seven out of nine members of the Standing Committee – this is the most powerful decisionmaking body, the supreme decisionmaking body – will be changed. And also the same pattern in the government, in terms of the State Council: seven out of eight people highly likely will be replaced. Also, seven out ten members of the central military commission wll be replaced. So, that high level, with that kind of percentage is remarkable, or unprecedented.

Secondly, this is the time first time in modern history that China emerged as an economic superpower, or even the #2 most important economy. So, leadership change, and also possible policy change will have strong impact, not only to China, but also beyond the Chinese borders, particularly economic and social policy, and also foreign policy.

And thirdly, this leadership challenge occurs at a time when there’s a lot of change in Chinese society. There’s a growing resentment by various social groups – by middle class and poor people – and there is also serious concern about China’s future, and the direction – particularly, political direction – where China is heading.